Archive for July, 2010

CRA LAWYERS REPORT 27TH JULY 2010

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Notes of the meeting held in the Camposol Business Centre on Tuesday 27th July 2010. 10.50hrs

In attendance;
Bob Owen ………………Chairman CRA CLC
Joyce Stewart…………. Treasurer/Vice Chair.
Dr Peter Pitt…………….Committee member
Louis Canovas………….Lawyer
Anna Vivancos………….Lawyer

Anna had met with Ricardo the council’s lawyer and had established the following facts.

It is legal to form an entity with restricted responsibilities before the urbanisation is completed to specification.

It is the council’s intention to introduce an entity (or more than one) for Camposol. It will be the first step in a stage by stage plan to resolve all the problems with Camposol.

There is a political willingness to resolve the problems on a legal basis.
The completion of Camposol will take place, organised by the council one step at a time. The council are confident that sufficient funds are available from guarantees and assets.

Modification of the Plan Parcial will be needed to address all the problems. (touristico, rambla etc etc)

Camposol is a large development and once completed to the council’s original plans, will be run by the residents. This is the only and legal way that Camposol can be administered.

By- laws for the entity on B, C & D will be created by negotiation with the town hall, the resident’s representatives and lawyer.

The by-laws for Sector A are in place.

Initially the entity will be set up and run by the management committee of owners in conjunction with an administrator and a councillor.

The entity will initially accept responsibility for fixed minimum services of street lighting, street cleaning and green areas.
As each other area of work is completed to the council’s satisfaction it can be taken over by agreement with the entity.

Once negotiations are complete and the entity formed a change of power in the town hall can not change the entity or the conditions or by-laws of the entity without the agreement of the residents.

Once an entity is formed we would have a legal right to take part in decisions of planning. Until then, no entity means no input and we would have to accept whatever conditions and by-laws the council decided on.

The administrator will carry out the instructions of the management committee. They are there to administer the wishes of the residents via the management committee.

Anyone in arrears with entity payments can not vote at an AGM.

An entity has a right to instruct the council to collect community charges agreed by the residents at the AGM. The entity has a right to impose on the council the duty of collecting and taking action against defaulters at no extra cost to the entity.

Currently our contracts state that the residents will pay for the complete management of the urbanisation. Anna our lawyer says parts of this are open to negotiations.

If we sit back and do nothing the entity can be imposed on us without our input. We have a chance to negotiate on many points with the council because the political will is there to allow it.

The lawyer’s proposal is as follows;

1. They will quote us a fixed fee to cover all negotiations, the setting up of the entity (regardless of hours spent) and the first two years of administration on our behalf. That takes us from now until the 3rd AGM of the entity. (end of year two).
The fees would be those laid down by the rules of the Professional Association of Administrators, and because of the sheer number of houses involved, less a discount.

2. Once up and running we will have the choice to stay with them or change to another company as we see fit.

3. The lawyers wish to restate that the entity will be run by the management committee. The Administrator is only there to carry out your instructions, ensure you get value for money, collect what’s due to you from everyone and ensure you don’t infringe any laws. They do not dictate policy.

The fee quotation will be prepared for consideration at our AGM in early September.

Bob Owen asked for the lawyers to be present at the AGM to answer any questions arising. The meeting closed at 12.30.

Camposol A Clean-up and Gardening Volunteer Group.

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Latest :

It will have been noticed that the park area near the commercial sector and opposite the new health centre has been cleared. A bench and some plants have been placed opposite the clinic, funded by contributions to this group. Apart from much of the perimeter, which has been prepared by ourselves, the heavy work has been done by Masa. This is a great improvement, whatever initiated Masa to do it and we are most appreciative. We now need to keep it looking good and ask for volunteers to help. Anyone interested please contact David.

We thought it was time to hold an open meeting to show what we are doing now, and hear suggestions of what we may manage in the future. This will be held at Terraza Lara (Mariano´s Pool) on the 9th. September at 11 a.m. – EVERYONE WELCOME.

We had promised another street party for the end of July. Unfortunately this has had to be cancelled. We hope to do something later in the year so watch this space ! These are always very happy social events and a valuable means of raising much needed funds. We also hope to hold a fashion show (for the ladies) soon.

We are pleased to notice that the new litter bins placed in the park are being used, mainly by responsible dog owners. We would like to encourage all dog owners, in the whole of Camposol to clean up after their pet. All that is needed is a plastic bag, which can be used to remove and contain the mess. This can then be tied shut and dropped into the nearest bin.

Finally, the weather has almost beaten us for now, being too hot for gardening or heavy work, so only basic street cleaning is possible for the time being, but we hope to restart with a full team of volunteers in September.

For any further info, or to make donations, discuss placing a plant or a bench in the memorial garden, or to offer help in any way, please contact David Holley, 968 130 487.

CRA Central Liaison Committee Meeting 67 13th July 2010 Minutes

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

67th CRA MEETING HELD TUESDAY 13TH JULY 2010

Present:
Bob Owen (BO) CHAIRMAN
Les Crook (LC) SECRETARY
Joyce Stewart (JS) VICE CHAIRMAN/TREASURER
Barry Eveleigh (BE) COMMUNICATIONS SECRETARY
Peter Pitt (PP)
John Daw (JD)
Jose Navarro (JN)

A review of the meeting with the Mayor about the instigation of an Entity took place. The partial Entity proposed by the council was described as covering street lighting, cleaning and green areas. Jackie Galvez explained the council would arrange a meeting to explain this to the residents of Camposol and seek nominations for the management committee.. She stated that all residents would be involved not just the Residents Association.

BO had a meeting with Luis of the Business Centre to seek advice regarding lawyers acting for us in the future. A meeting has been arranged with Anna, a lawyer whose speciality is urbanisation law, on Thursday 15th July and BO, LC, JN, JD and JS will be present. JS pointed out that she didn’t think the CRA could afford to pay a lawyer for long term. BO replied that it was his thoughts that we should only engage a lawyer on a pay as you go basis and seek advice one step at a time. The first step is to check if the Mayors proposal for a partial entity is legal and where we go from there.

It has been suggested from some quarters that the CRA fund technical reports & legal assistance for the A.S.H.O.C. Over the years the A.S.H.O.C. have spurned numerous approaches from the C.R.A. to cooperate over dealings with the Mazarron Council while Mazarron Council have chosen to marginalise the CRA by refusing them an input on matters pertaining to sector A.

The CRA therefore do not think it appropriate that that they spend money that has been kindly donated by its members from all sectors of Camposol in pursuing actions they have no input in or control over.

BO had however written to the Sector A Chairman requesting an informal meeting to discuss the problems both were experiencing with the town hall. He had a reply that Frans Permentier would contact him in the near future to arrange an informal get together.

AGM: PP is trying to contact Diego at the hotel to make arrangements for a meeting in September.

BE is working on the Simple Guide to Camposol which we hope to publish before the AGM.
LC is also working on the local information guide, again hopefully to be published for the AGM.

Recruitment Drive: JN is going to ask the manager of Consum if we can use their lobby. BO had spoken to RAMA in Bollywood and he had agreed for us to use his forecourt as well. It was suggested that perhaps Val could have recruitment forms available when she in Kennelly’s on Friday’s. JS will speak to her. JD will do a ‘trial run’ on Friday 23rd July.

Bank Signatures: With the departure of Gregg Green and Mary Cooper from the Committee it was proposed that BO and LC should be the new signatories on the existing bank account.

Cabin: It was reported that the cabin door is not shutting properly and needs a carpenter to look at it, and possibly make a letter box in the door, for membership forms to be posted. LC is going to talk to a carpenter.

Spanish view of Camposol: BO asked JN if he could tell from the meeting with the Mayor what they actually thought of the CRA. JN said they he got the impression from the council that we were worried about our position regarding an Entity. They thought that the CRA only represented our side of the motorway, B-C-D. Jackie Galvez actually said that ‘they are worried about their side of the road’. JN thought that we should be united with Sector A rather than be divided. He thought the Council feels that if they negotiate with the CRA concerning Sector A then that will negate the ASHOC.

A.O.B : PP advised that there is an Ombudsman for Local Government. This was already known by some members.

JD suggested we offer the cabin to Age Concern on the days we are not using it. BO has been invited to the launch meeting of Age Concern on the 17th September at the yacht club in the Port of Mazarron.

JS thought we should open the cabin more frequently. This will be looked at after the August break.

Cover is arranged for 19th July with JN and PP and for the 26th July with JD and his wife with BO as backup.

Meeting closed at 12.55.

Following the main meeting a one agenda meeting took place. The one item under discussion is the closure of the Cajamurcia bank account, because it is not used and is incurring bank charges. JS had a letter prepared for the committee members to sign as authorisation to close this account.

CRA Mayor Meeting 7th July 2010 Minutes

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

CRA /Mayor Meeting July 7th 2010

Meeting started at 12:50

Those present:
For the Town Hall:
Francisco Blaya, Mayor.
Jacqueline Gálvez, Councillor for Foreigners.
José Antonio Román, Councillor for Urbanism.
Ricardo Fernandez, Lawyer.
For the CRA:
Bob Owen, Chairman.
Barrie Eveleigh.
Pete Pitt.
John Daws.
José Navarro.

1. J.N. and J.G. agreed to share the role of translators for this meeting.

2. Secondly, permission was asked for B.E. to record our meeting with a voice recorder. F.B. said there was no problem.

3. The meeting begun with Jose thanking all those present for attending the meeting, especially the Mayor.

4. B.O. asked “In the recent meeting between ASHC and the Mayor and meeting between the CRA and councillor Galvez the minutes state that you are now going to enforce a Entitad on Sector A and then presumably the rest of Camposol. This contradicts the possible middle way forward that has been discussed with you in meetings with the CRA over the last 9 months. Is this what you intend and if so why the change in policy?”

F.B. explained that they had not changed their policy towards Camposol, they are following the procedure laid down by the law relating to not only Camposol but to all urbanizations. They had been looking to find a formula that would be the best way forward for the procedure of the self management of Camposol. He also stated that the Plan General, the Plan Parcial and our contracts state that Camposol will be run by an entity. The Council are looking at the best way to assist with the collection of community fees as they found that the problem of how to ensure that all residents paid their fees was the biggest fear when the first entity was set up on A Sector some years ago. He went on to say that it has to be clear that all the costs associated with this and the maintenance of the community will have to be met by the residents and they have always said that. He added that “Camposol should be self sufficient.” “The Council will ensure that the administration is being done properly.” He went on to say that they are trying to find administration companies that have experience of the type of urbanization such as Camposol and what they will have to do with that company is find a way to finish the urbanization. Entities have duties regarding conservation and maintenance. To get Camposol up and running the residents will be responsible for the street lighting, cleaning and conservation of landscaping areas. These landscaped areas are in fact being looked after by the residents already. The Mayor thought that the best option is to suggest two or three administration companies and we can choose whether to go with one of those or look elsewhere.

J.G. stated the Town Hall have to deal with representatives of all homeowners, and not just a residents association.

F.B. said the Town Hall will study how to elect this representative committee of all B, C and D proprietors.

5. B.O. “In the Plan Parcial for B, C & D it states that these sectors when taken over by the Council will become part of the entidad that will have been formed for A Sector. How can this now be amended to your proposal of different entidads for different sectors?”

F. B. The matter of whether there will be one or two entities or whether they will come together is complicated and it might be better to have several because of the size.

B.E. made the point that the Garrigues report states that B C & D sectors join A sector’s conservation body.

R.F answered by stating that there are no legal restrictions and once the administration is put in place we can organize ourselves as we wish. We could even have separate administrations for poligonos if we like although each separately managed area would have to contribute to the common facilities such as that of the treatment works
.
F.B. said that because of the reality of the situation and especially the street lights, the self management should function now.

B.E. “Are you saying we should start the entity process on B, C & D now?”
J.G. “Yes.”

B.E “Even though the infrastructure is far from being up to standard or completed?”

F.B. & R.F. both said yes but it would still have to be completed.

J.G added that we “would be paying for the street lighting not mending the roads.”

F.B “The Council have to by what ever means ensure Masa finish the Urbanization by taking the guarantee or whatever.”

B.E “But we know and the Mayor has agreed that there is a big shortfall between the guarantees and the amount needed to put things right.”

F.B “First we have to get that guarantee and see what we can do with it. We are going to take the route that will finish the urbanization. We will see what the administration company can do, we shall see what the bank guarantees are and what we can do but we have to find that route.”

B.E. Shouldn’t there be a detailed survey done by engineers to determine what the cost will be.

J.G “They are doing that. The detailed survey goes back to Masa telling them what is needed.”

J.A.R. stated that they already had reports for all Camposol.

B.E. questioned this on the basis that there has not been any evidence of the presence of the necessary engineers or the type of investigation that would be needed. A suitable survey would for instance need such things as test bores to investigate the underlying problems with the roads.

B.O. “Can we summarise?” You believe we have come to a crossroads where we have to start looking after things ourselves by way of an entity or the like, but we will not be responsible for unfinished works or works not up to standard.

R.F said we should not worry, we (the council) shall have to do what we have to do, and we do not have to complicate your lives. It is the council’s responsibility to ensure Camposol is finished to the set standards. At the same time we (the residents) have to organise to pay for expenses relating to the responsibilities that we take over. (Street lights, street cleaning and green areas)

F.B. “An Entity or any other form will not be responsible for any part of the infrastructure that had not been accepted by the council as up to standard and fit to hand over. The initial entities will run in parallel with the council administration. The council will be responsible for getting the infrastructure up to standard before handing it over to the entity. The council will seize the bank guarantees, decide with us on priorities and attend to them. The council will then seize land, assets and anything else to secure funds to finish of the infrastructure.”

P.P. asked if the Town Hall have to wait until the 2013 deadline to take action.

R.F. stated that because of the building phases are not completed, we have not to wait until 2013 and this deadline should not be considered at all.

J.G. stated the Town Hall is actually planning this and that the Council is no longer dealing with MASA in a friendly way.

6. B.O. “Will the residents of Camposol be expected to pay for the shortfall?”

F.B. stated that the shortfall was for the council to sort out and it should not be of concern to us, it was their job to ensure everything was finished to standard.

B.E. asked what the monetary amount of that shortfall is.

J.A.R. stated they have not quantified it yet.

7. B.O. raised the subject of the database.

F.B. said the council and admin company were able to compile that from their own and others records.

8 J. N. stated that duties about conservation and about maintenance are separate duties, and not the same one. And that Entities have mandatory duty of conservation, but not in maintenance, as it can be read in the Garrigues report. Therefore is no obligation for a virtual entity to pay for the electric power to the street lights and that Garrigues Report and article 26 of law 7/1985 support this position.

F. B. stated the Town Hall is not able to pay for the street lighting. It is the residents responsibility.

R.F. stated that, anyway, in the actual legal situation of Camposol, homeowners have to pay for street lighting. He also stated that this is just a detail and the important thing for Camposol as a whole was to form an entity or other form of self-management.

J. N. stated this particular detail is an important one for our members.

R. F. stated that once an Entity (or another form of self management) is running, further discussions about particular responsibilities can be arranged.

9. B.O. “As you are aware there is an ongoing strategy from Masa with possibly the assistance of Iberdrola to cut off the street lighting on Camposol. It will not be long before there is complete darkness and Camposol becomes an open house to every thief in Spain. This is obviously not acceptable and as the Mayor you have a legal duty of care, as stated in the Garrigues report, for all citizens on Camposol. Is it not about time that you took direct action to correct this serious situation?”

F.B. stated we must organise ourselves the sooner the better, to try to resolve this because the Town Hall can not. However, the Town Hall will do whatever it is legally bound to.

10. B.O. “At the last CRA meeting with the Mayor the council lawyer said that the problems with the rambla on sector D, which was holding up the acceptance of sector B, C & D, was not a major issue. Can we have an update on how this matter is progressing?”

R. F. stated that it is really a major issue but that is progressing through normal legal procedures. There was nothing new to report at this time.

11. B.O. “What is the latest on the Medical Centre Opening?”

F.B: “Medical centre will open this autumn, quite likely September. There are only a few small requirements to get it completed”

12. B.O. “What is the latest on the construction of the community centre?”

F.B.: “Contracts for building of the Community Centre were signed yesterday. They now have one month to start building”

13. B.O. “As you are aware there are many disabled car badge holders on Camposol but no parking spaces allocated for their use in the two commercial centres. Can this be corrected?”

F.B. said the council would investigate the situation of disabled parking bays.

B.O. pointed out that the taxi rank was unused and a waste of three parking spaces.

14. B.O. “With the hot weather and tourist season upon us, as you kindly did last year, could you increase the number of rubbish collections per week during this period?”

F.B. said refuse collection was still not being paid by Masa, but they will look into it.
Despite that, J.N. agreed to personally talk with Salvador Ardil, the councillor in charge of refuse collection, who was not present at the meeting.

The meeting closed at 14:20.