Archive for the ‘AGM/EGM Minutes’ Category

AGM MINUTES 7/9/2010

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

C.R.A. MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON TUESDAY 7TH SEPTEMBER 2010 AT THE SENSOL HOTEL AT 10 AM.

Present:

Bob Owen                    Chairman

Les Crook                   Secretary

Joyce Stewart          Vice Chair/Treasurer

Barrie Eveleigh        Committee Member

Peter Pitt                    Committee Member

Sandy Allison           Committee Member

Jackie Drewe            Committee Member

John Dawes               Committee Member

Apologies for absence;

Jose Navarro

Bob Owen opened the meeting by welcoming those present and explaining the format of the meeting.

He went on to explain that only three of the original committee was left, all the others including him had been co opted on. He asked for a show of hands to accept the new Committee Members. This was unanimous.

Rod Sawyer proposed the minutes of the last meeting be accepted and this was seconded by Tony Hagen. A unanimous vote was achieved.

Bob gave a review of committee activities and projects that had been undertaken since the last AGM.

  1. The members had failed to raise the cash to take the council to court. The committee had no choice but to abandon the idea.
  2. It was agreed to rescind the payment of 10 Euros for membership as very few members re registered and paid the fee. Some members have been refunded. The money collected so far would go towards general funds if there was no objection. No objection was raised from those assembled.
  3. The ICA under build has been very successful and is now used by various organizations and is self supporting .
  4. A meeting had been held with Confereracion Hidrografica. They are still awaiting an environmental report from Masa. It is now in the hands of the council’s lawyer.
  5. Iberdrola . A meeting had been requested with Iberdrola to no avail. It had been hoped to resolve the street lighting problems.
  6. Sewage and Water Leak Reports. Jackie Galvez agreed to pass on all messages from us to the relevant authorities for action to be taken. This was set up about four months ago, and is very successful. A dedicated telephone number for people to ring if they have a problem has been allocated. It is 634 364 739.  There will be a duty committee member on this number 9 am to 6 pm Monday to Friday.
  7. Bob had called a meeting of the community groups, of B, C, and D. He wanted them to start working together, and sharing expertise. They have repaired drain covers on B sector together. This is an ongoing project.
  8. Attempts to formally meet the A sector committee have failed. They are quite prepared to meet informally to exchange views common to both groups.  A separate meeting with members of the CRA members on A sector is being arranged.
  9. During a meeting with the Mayor in February we were informed that the council is going to seize Masa´s guarantees so that they can start work on completion of Camposol.
  10. At the last meeting with the Mayor there was a complete turnaround. New legal advisers to the mayor advised him that he has to follow the law. He is going to implement an Entity for the whole of Camposol. This is fully explained in the ‘Guide to Camposol’. This information is factual, not speculative.
  11. Les Crook and Bob Owen were invited to attend the Town Hall for a meeting with Santiago Martinez who is part of a four man team, comprising engineers and architects, who have been appointed by the Mayor to resolve all the problems on Camposol. Some works have started to happen. Pavements on B sector have started to be repaired.
  12. Santiago requested that we make a list of all the properties that have been abandoned or have overgrown gardens and they will take steps to have these properties cleared. Lloyd Jones has been appointed Project Co-coordinator.
  13. School Project. Les Crook advised that the CRA had been approached by the senior school in Mazarron to help with English conversation classes at the school. He has had a very good response to this and has about 20 volunteers so far. A new timetable will be available mid-September and Les will advise the volunteers so that he can produce a schedule to present to the school.

FINANCIAL REPORT  by Joyce Stewart, Treasurer.

First a brief summary of year 2009 finances.

During 2009 2 long standing dormant accounts were closed.

The balances remaining were transferred to the General Fund account.

This left two accounts open at year end, the Legal Fund held in La Caixa, and the General Fund  in Cajamurcia.

Over 15,000€ was added to Legal Fund Account throughout 2009 which came from Admin fees, Donations, the EGM and AGM bucket collection,  and the monthly Bonus Ball Draw.

The only withdrawal was 400€ to refund donations.

The General Fund is used for expenses, and any projects costs. Throughout last year the income from the raffle was used as Petty Cash to cover all costs and expenses and over the year added 610€ to the GF account.

Year end balances were 19,428·75 in the legal fund at La Caixa and.

822.94  in the General Fund in Cajamurcia..

Moving on to this year:

When Correos opened the post room venue for selling tickets was lost which left no option but stop the Weekly Raffle meaning there would be no further regular income to the General Fund.

Due to “customer resistance”, the mandated 10€ membership/admin fee was discontinued by decision of the committee in January. At the same meeting it was decided that the amount already raised in admin fees should be regarded as General fund rather than Legal Fund, and in fairness to all who had paid, that this fee would be refundable on request.

Donations to the Legal fund always had the proviso that they would be refundable if insufficient funds couldn’t be raised to take the proposed Legal action against the Council.

This proved to be the case and to date a total of 1,750€ .has been refunded from donations received, and 220€ refunded from admin fees.

All this leaves only voluntary donations from new members, and the Bonus Ball Draw as currently the only source of fundraising.

New and re-registering members now choose to which fund their donations are added, and they are banked accordingly.

So far this year 390€ has been donated toward the General Fund and 235€ to the Legal Fund with the Bonus Ball  adding a further 1,708€ to the Legal fund.

Thanks to the efforts of Val and Bob over the last three years, over 7,000€ has been raised via the Bonus Ball Draw and added to the Legal Fund, and the same amount given back to the lucky winners. The CRA must be the only organisation around which gives back half of its fundraising income as a thank you to its supporters.

On behalf of the members, the committee offers its sincere thanks to Val and Bob for their continued efforts in these difficult times.

Without a regular income to General Funds there was a need to cut costs. The Movistar Phone contracts have been ended, and replaced by 2 PAY AS YOU GO mobiles. One is for the Chairman’s use. The other for the committee member on phone duty.

The 2 remaining bank accounts have been consolidated to save on bank charges.

The balance  at Cajamurcia has been transferred to La Caixa, added to the amount paid in Admin/Membership fees, and is classed as the General Fund.

All previous donations and income to the Legal fund remain as such.

A record is kept which shows what % of the total is for General fund use and what is the Legal Fund.

The balance in La Caixa  today, 7th September 2010 is 19,297.63€. Of this 12,983.29€ is the legal fund and 6,314.34 is the general fund.

The details of income and expenditure for 2009, and 2010 to date, can be seen at the cabin on Fridays for the next 4 weeks.

The collection after today’s AGM raised 431.50€ to be added to the Legal Fund.

J Stewart

Treasurer

Proposal l

That any proposal put before an AGM /EGM by a member must be achievable and must comply with Spanish law.

Proposed by Stan Long

Seconded by Mike Drummond

245  (100%) approval of meeting attendees.

PROXY votes: 48 for, 2 against, 2 abstained

Total 293 for, 2 against, 2 abstained

Proposal 2

That the committee be allowed to enter negotiations with the council to ensure that the residents of Camposol receive the best possible deal available in the forthcoming Entity planning process. Any deal negotiated, guided by our lawyers, will be reported back to an EGM for final approval.

Proposed by Peter Pitt

Seconded by Les Crook

237 approval of meeting attendees, 4 against, 4 abstained,

PROXY votes: 47 for, 5 against.

Total 284 for, 9 against, 4 abstained

Proposal 3

That the services of Anna Vivancos of Espadas and Associates, Lawyers be retained as legal advisors to the CRA.

Proposed by Rod Sawyer

Seconded by Lloyd Jones

Bob Owen advised the costs of this company as follows:

Constitution of the Urban Conservation Entity Sector B, C, and D

For attending unlimited meetings on our behalf 1,500 Euros + vat

For the constitution of an entity, which includes drafting of statutes, call for first constituent meeting, registration of the statutes in the Register of Collaborating Entities of the City of Mazarron, an amount of 3,000 Euros per sector. That’s a maximum total of 9,000 Euros + vat. In this case the 1500 + vat is included in this price.

244 approval of meeting attendees,  1 vote against

PROXY votes: 46 for, 2 against, 4 abstained.

Total 290 for, 3 against, 4 abstained

Election of Committee for the forthcoming year.

All committee members were accepted by a unanimous decision.

The Chairman then thanked all those attending for their support and assured the meeting of the committee’s commitment to achieving the best deal possible on their behalf.

Meeting closed at 10.40 am.

CRA AGM Minutes 29th June 2009

Monday, July 27th, 2009

CRA – AGM 29th June 2009 – Minutes

Meeting Minutes
Camposol Residents Association – AGM
Monday 29th June 2009 at 11am

Greg Green, Chairman: The first thing I must do today is to thank the Fiesta Committee for the fiesta they have all worked so hard to put on for Camposol over the last two days. We as a committee admire their dedication and drive over the last twelve months or more to put this together, I have also heard they are already talking about repeating it again next year, we wish them well. This was applauded warmly by the CRA members present.

Greg continued. Today’s agenda, as published, covers a lot of areas but I am sure that you will find everything of great interest and informative. Because the agenda is wide, so that I can be as factual as possible, I will be using quite detailed notes, and at times to ensure the meeting remains within the boundaries that we have set I may well have to call a stop to some discussions that wander off of the point. So that remarks do not become personal could you please direct all remarks through the chair. A full set of my notes with additions as necessary will be published on our website and on the notice board from tomorrow.

My next task this morning is to introduce your new committee which you recently voted in.

I think most people now know me, but for those that don’t my name is Greg Green and I am your Chairman.
Sitting next to me are:
Jane Walters – Deputy Chairperson.
Joyce Stewart – Treasurer
Mary Cooper – Secretary
Les Crook – Membership Secretary
Also with us on the table I would like you to welcome Senor Fernando Del Canto and José Manuel Diaz Montes who will speak to you later.
The remainder of the committee are:
Mick Drummond : Communications Secretary (Website & Newsletters)
John Daw – Fund Raising & Social Secretary
Tom Carpenter – Fund Raising & Social Secretary
Geoff Nastri – With his Italian Mafia background we call him the CRA enforcer.

I would also at this point like to give recognition to two other groups of people working behind the scenes of the CRA. The first is a small group who come together and write letters and assist with our agreed lobbying activities. The other group is some ladies who I am sure most of you have been harassed by at some time or other, who spend their time in Rumours Post Room every afternoon selling raffle tickets for our weekly meat draw which as you will hear later provides money to cover any expenses that we may have.

I have one final thank you and that is to the owners of Rumours for allowing us the use of their facilities this morning free of charge. We have been criticised in the past for supporting Masa by using the hotel for meetings. In future we will be revolving our meetings around Rumours, Kinnelly’s & The Trevi Bar who have all offered their facilities free of charge.

Let me now move on to the Chairman’s Annual Report. Well the 10 months since the last AGM we held in August 2008 has certainly seen some changes.

In October we at last saw the publishing of the Garrigues Report. A lot has been said about this report but for €8,400 it has proven to give exceptional value for money. I have attended many meetings since its publication and it has been quoted many times by the Mayor, Jacqueline Galvez, Masa, lawyers, the media and many times by committee members of the CRA. I have never known it to be factually challenged and it has formed a sound base for many of our policy decisions.

We have called two EGMs each attended by over 300 members. The second of these was followed by a demonstration in front of the town hall when even with conservative estimates there were 500 people there. As you will hear later I’m sure that this will not be the last demonstration we have. The first was good humoured, the next will still be good humoured but much louder.

We were instrumental in organising the Camposol clean-up campaign. This has over the last 7 months expanded in to a great success story with the D Sector community group being formed and arranging not only clean ups but also landscaping areas with funds gained through social events and bucket collections. At the same time this project has created a great community spirit. This has now been followed by A Sector and C Sector and partially on B Sector. I say thank you and well done to everyone involved. I would also like to acknowledge the input from Zoe & Lawrence of Simply Networking for their assistance in many of these schemes, also the various companies who have sponsored the planting of the roundabouts. As you will hear in a minute there are also other projects in hand.

In the middle of March we had to call an early election for the voting in of a new committee. This was necessary due to the resignations of both the Chairman and Deputy Chairman due to ill health and also because two other committee members moved back to the UK. I have previously done this publicly during the last EGM but I would like to once again thank Roy Pugh, the retiring Chairman and Brian Tokely, the retiring Vice Chairman, for all the effort and work they had put in to the CRA over the previous years. I should also like to pass on thanks to Ken Richardson, Rathnait Mullen and Erache Merino for the work they put in on behalf of the CRA.

The one disappointing thing about the election was the number of people who voted. It should have been much higher and I would like to make this point. I attended a meeting with Mary some two weeks ago in Mojacar organised by AULAN a pressure group to support the Prior family, who I’m sure many of you saw on television having their house demolished, and many others like them in Almeria. There were many other pressure groups there from Malaga in the South to Valencia in the North who is fighting against the land grab laws. The biggest message for me from this meeting was that “Apathy is not an option”. We have to mobilise and fight our cause. The evidence in Spain shows that if we don’t do this for ourselves in Camposol then no one else will. That means casting our vote in every election and supporting every meeting and demonstration. It also means getting inside the local political systems and applying the pressure you have by using your votes.

One other area of concern over the last 9 months, especially for those involved, has been the lack of advancement on the subject of escrituras for those polygonos without them. We know the reason why these are not available it is because Masa have not built certain polygonos in line with the original plan parcial. We know the solution is the passing of the revised plan parcial which should have been signed off by all parties last October. We are told that this revised plan is delayed by the Confederacion Hidragrafico in Murcia. We have been given the name of the man in Murcia who is responsible for signing the plan off and have been asked by the Mayor if we can help. That is amazing in itself!! We are currently awaiting an appointment with Senor Fransisco Rosello of the Confederacion Hidrafico to try to find out exactly what the delay is. Once we get this we will update all of those involved about the situation.

Well what else has your committee been up to since the election?

• We have been very active attending meetings with several groups of lawyers. This will be discussed later on.
• We have promoted the issues on Camposol through local and UK press, the local Spanish press and local Spanish Radio & Television.
• We have hosted visits by several political and media parties on a tour of Camposol highlighting the many problems we face. I think I am safe in saying that they were all shocked at the situation that some homeowners have to live in. If you saw the condition of some of these villas them I’m sure you would all understand why I say “apathy is not an option”.
• We have attended meetings such as that in Mojacar representing Camposol and the CRA.
• We have had meetings with the Mayor and Councillor Jacqueline Galvez. All of these have been reported on the website and on our notice board.
• Through the lobby group we have had meetings and put forward a lobbying plan soon to be published.
• We have now got our own premises in the shape of the CRA Cabin. Not ideal but soon to change as we will soon be taking up a permanent position in the Mapfre office. The cabin will remain in place for the present time and used for notices etc…
• After a request from members we are in the process of establishing a remembrance garden which will provide a peaceful area for reflection and remembrance.
• We have negotiated with Inside Out for the construction of two permanent bins areas to be built opposite the commercial area on sector B. This will take the bins off of the road, tidy up the area and hopefully make it a more pleasant environment to visit. This work is about to start this week.
• With the sponsorship of Mercers we have created a new Respect Camposol leaflet. This is not intended to lay down the law or put rules and regulations in to place but rather to act as a reminder to everyone who lives here or just visits of how we can make life in Camposol that little more enjoyable. We have printed 5,000 of these leaflets. Hopefully you all have a copy which was placed on your chair.
• Just two weeks ago we took the cases of many of our members with problems villas to the President of the Murcia Consumer Association and his legal team. They are very interested in taking our case on and we are waiting their proposals.
• Within the next two weeks we will have a new updated website at www.cracamposol.com. This will be much improved from the old website at www.thenewcamposolcourier.com and will include a forum where discussions on all issues concerning our members will take place.
• We have also been busy putting together the long awaited discount scheme. This will be talked about by Jane in a few minutes and I think that you will be very pleased at what benefits will become available to you as fully re-registered members of the CRA.

To conclude my Chairman’s Report I would like to say that trying to get anything resolved in Spain is a long, painful, drawn out and often frustrating process. We all need to understand this and show patience. I understand that this can be difficult but we must stay united and remember “Apathy is not an option”.

I would now like to hand you over to Joyce who will give you an update on the current financial situation within the CRA.

Joyce Stewart, CRA Treasurer:
As those of you who follow the minutes will already know, the CRA has 2 bank accounts.

The General Account is held at Cajamurcia Bank.

The only income to this account is from the weekly raffle, and this money is used to cover running costs and any projects agreed by the committee should other sponsorship not be forthcoming.

The committee has agreed that the balance in this account should generally not be less than 500€ to allow for emergency situations.

The Balance of this account stands today €821.52

Currently we have €610 cash in hand.

The Lawyers Fund Account is held in La Caixa Bank.

On the day of the EGM in February the balance stood €4,383•08

The collections tub on the day, after expenses, raised €225.00

Since then the Bonus Ball run for us by Val and Bob and donated goods sold at a boot sale by Mary Pugh –Roy’s wife have raised €950.00

Re-Registrations and Donations have raised€11,720.27

The bank has kindly charged 9€ for their services giving a balance today of
€ 17,269.35

The current bank statements are here to be seen by anyone who wishes to, and I’ll be happy to answer any questions after the meeting.

Finally, on behalf of the committee, can I ask you all to show your appreciation of Val and Bob who run the Bonus Ball to benefit the Lawyers Fund, and of Ros, Roisin and Sue our raffle ticket sellers, without their help the general fund wouldn’t be as healthy as it is. They all do an excellent job in what are difficult times for all of us.

Greg Green: The next section of the AGM is designed for the committee to layout its ideas of the way forward and will also give you an opportunity to ask questions and share your views. As I mentioned earlier please keep your questions and points within the subject being discussed at any time.

Firstly I am going to hand over to Les to take us through the current membership and re-registration of members as we stand today.

Les Crook, Membership Secretary: The current number of members on the register 1997
Of these members there are 520 new and re-registered members who have paid the agreed €10 administration fee which goes straight to the Lawyers fund.
Unfortunately only 337 of these are re-registrations”

Greg Green: As you can see we are now left with a problem. At the last EGM it was proposed from the floor that all members re-register and pay a 10 Euro admin fee. As Les said we currently have about 520 members under the re-register scheme who have each paid 10 Euros. Only about 337 of these are actual re-registrations the rest being new members. This leaves some 1400 other members who have not re-registered. I now want to put this situation out to the floor and get your reaction on how you wish to proceed with this process.

Some discussion took place on this subject some of which were:

Lesley, “there are many holiday homes near to where I live and I feel that it is up to permanent residents to ensure when these homeowners do visit that we as members speak with them and encourage them to re-register their membership, is it possible that people could pay their dues by direct debit?”

Greg Green, “we could look into this for the future”

Pauline, “it is very important that we build a membership and pay a yearly fee, could we put some leaflets in the post room etc? We are all fed up and we all live here and the fee should be paid individually, not per house?”

Stan, “I agree in part with Pauline and suggest that we do a mail shot to those who have not re-registered asking them to re-register by return of mail”

Greg Green: “Yes, a good idea but unfortunately the original membership register did not have details of UK addresses which is one of the things that we are including in the new register along with email addresses”

Alan, “may I suggest that if members hear of people who are returning to the UK to live, there are a few in my area, then we must be responsible for passing their details to the CRA so they can be removed from the register”

Richard, “why not put an article in the Journal with a copy of the registration form for those who wish to fill in at home and return?”

Greg Green, “a good idea we will look into this. What is your general view about yearly fees? Does anyone have any further views?”

Gordon, “annual fees are what give you a good idea of actual numbers, we must have yearly fees”

Brian, “I think a low yearly fee might be acceptable then leave it up to the individual to decide if they have had value for money and to make their individual donation accordingly”

Further discussion took place and it was suggested that all members who have re-registered for this year will not have to pay again until March 2010, if by this time there are still members who have not re-registered then they should be removed as members. Those members who have re-registered should have the privilege of the various benefits on offer to CRA members. It was also suggested that poligono reps. should be recruited to help boost membership and to keep members informed of what is going on.

Greg Green asked the floor to show their support, or not, for the charging of yearly fees. A fee of €10 would be charged to each individual and not per house, the membership year would run from March to March and dues must be fully paid by the 1st of June each year. It was also requested that a reminder of the above should be published each year.

Proposer, Peter Mendham – Seconded, Stan Long agreed by the majority present with the exception of 3 who were against the proposal.

Camposol Residents Association – Standing Rules: Reference the above agreement the following details will be added to Chapter 2 of the Camposol Residents Association Standing Rules under Membership Obligations.

4. To pay annual Association Dues in the amount established by Assembly.
(A membership year will run from March – March and dues must be paid in full by 1st of June each year)

Greg Green: As a member of an association the size of the CRA there has to be benefits to be gained. One of these is the buying power that numbers can buy. We have been contacted many times by local firms wishing to offer our members a good deal on their products. To deal with each one individually would have taken huge administration resources which we don’t have. So that we can all benefit from this situation we have decided to start a discount scheme listing all local businesses who will give some kind of benefit to you for just being a member of the CRA. To outline this benefit I am going to hand over to Jane.

Jane Walters, Vice Chairperson The discount scheme comes in 2 parts, part one being commercial businesses and part two being community projects or for want of a better word community gains.

The CRA have approached and been approached by a number of businesses within the area that feel they can offer members a discount. These businesses are listed on our notice board. To name a few such as A1 Excavate & Build, the Calida Group Alarms systems etc and as an association we feel that the more businesses that take part in this scheme the more we as a community benefit.

Due to the man power of the CRA we have encouraged each business to negotiate their own individual discount for the CRA consumer group which can be obtained on request.
The Second part to the scheme is more of a community welfare gain aiding everyone from young to old.

The ICA medical centre based on sector B2 has offered their hall facilities for various community groups. The hall/ under build is a good size with good access and will benefit many of the gardening groups for meetings etc. The scouts and brownies will be taking advantage of these facilities from August.

This hall will be managed and booked through the CRA, all enquiries to a committee member please.

In addition to this the ICA has offered a discount on their GP and Nurse medical care, this entails unlimited visits to the Doctor and Nurse each month for only €15, of which €2 goes to the CRA for further fund raising.

This offer is organised and will be monitored by ICA Medicas.

For both schemes your membership card with valid ID must be produced.

Any further questions/information can be gained after this meeting or will be available from the CRA office at our usual opening times.

Greg Green: The way forward in regards of proposed legal action.

This section can be broken down in to two parts:

1. The completion of Camposol by Masa in line with the approved plans and the acceptance of all sectors of Camposol by the Council.
2. The second is the legalisation of all of your properties so that you have full escrituras (deeds), signed architects reports, licences for all extra work completed by Abril 28, certificates of habitacion and your 10 year guarantee.

In the last EGM you unanimously agreed to raise up to 84,000 Euros with the intention of taking legal action against the council to force Masa to complete Camposol. As you have heard we have to date collected just over 17,000 Euros. It was originally agreed that we could not start legal action until we had security of the full amount in the bank. As this has obviously not happened as quickly as we would have liked we have been back to the lawyers and they have agreed to break the procedure down in to financially manageable stages. The first stage, as agreed in the original plan, was for a meeting with our lawyers to be held with the Mayor and his legal team to negotiate a plan to get Masa to finish Camposol and get it taken over by the Council in a reasonable period of time. The Council would be informed that if they did not agree to this way forward then further legal action would be taken against them. The lawyers would proceed with this process up to the point of further legal action if required for a payment of 11,000 Euros. There would be a down payment of 6,000 Euros with the remaining 5,000 Euros being paid at the end of this stage.

To undertake this process it is not possible for the action to be taken in the name of the CRA, it must be in the names of individual villa owners. A class action would be started in the names of those who volunteer with the lawyers acting in one action for all. The aim is to put the council in a position of legal responsibility by showing that legally they have allowed us to live here and that can be proven by the issuing of deeds and accepting of taxes.

If you volunteered what would be expected of you.

a. You would need to provide copies of your escrituras and any paper work issued by the council such as licences, IBI, car tax & utility bills.
b. You would need to give the lawyers power of attorney to act in this case ONLY on your behalf.

How many volunteers do we need? The more the better!

Currently we have just a handful of volunteers who have come forward. What I want to do now is to get your views and for you to say how you wish the committee to proceed or not proceed with this process.

The chair asked for a show of hands of those who are willing to volunteer to put their paperwork etc. forward, there was a good response.

Further discussion took place and questions were asked regarding the responsibilities that would be applied to volunteers, it was explained that anyone who volunteered would do so at no risk monetary or otherwise to themselves as the legal fund would cover all costs.

The general consensus of opinion was that the CRA must continue to take legal action and that we need to raise our profile with more demonstrations outside of the Town Hall, we have to stand up and be counted! Reference was made to the action that took place around the stopping of the postal system and the instant action taken by the Correos.

A proposal to continue to take legal action was put forward by Lesley Dunton and was seconded by Winston Stott, this proposal was agreed and carried by the majority with the exception of one member.

Greg Green: stated that this discussion on this subject was now finished. But if members wanted to know more and are willing to volunteer they should hand in their details at the end of the meeting and the CRA will arrange another meeting, with the lawyers present, as soon as possible to give out more information.

Greg reminded the membership once again that, “Apathy is not an option”. This affects us all.

Greg Green: As mentioned earlier the second part of the legal situation is the legalisation of all of your properties so that you have full escrituras (deeds), signed architects reports, licences for all extra work completed by Abril 28, the 10 year guarantee and certificates of habitacion.

Some two months ago I had a meeting with Gerard from Mercers who were obviously trying to sell properties on Camposol. Unfortunately in most cases it was impossible to sell a house due to one or more of the documents mentioned not being available. Mercers decided, as all of these documents came through Masa, that the legal route was not an option to most people. It was expensive, takes too long and even if you get a judgement against Masa they were likely to appeal or even ignore the findings.
They decided to contact a legal company called Konsilia from the Costa Del Sol. This company have great experience in these matters and rather than litigate against the developer, as their name indicates, they prefer to conciliate between the developer and the owner to come to a beneficial conclusion to both parties. I have had several meetings with Konsilia and I know they have had several meetings with the legal team from Masa.

The CRA committee would like to offer this option as a solution to getting their members villas fully legalised. It is an option you have open to you. You all have differing situations. When you have the details the choice is yours and yours alone. There is no financial gain in any way for the CRA.

I would like to hand you over now to Fernando Del Canto who is a Spanish Abagado is also a UK Barrister, he will explain the options available to you.

Fernando Del Canto: gave a presentation to the members on the details of what services are available through his company for individuals to allow them to legalise their properties. Fernando explained that one to one meetings will be set up over the next few weeks and interested parties were invited to speak with him and his colleague after the meeting.

Fernando also re-iterated to the meeting on the subject of the legal action being taken by the CRA that it is a must!

Greg Green: Regarding the Sector A Homeowners Committee. Over the last 3 months Mary and I have attended a meeting with Chairman of the A Sect Homeowners Committee and one of its members. We requested that, as we have a common purpose, their committee have regular meetings with the CRA and agree to the CRA playing a full part in the negotiations with the Council in the takeover of Sector A and subsequently the rest of Camposol.

Some weeks later the ASHC wrote back to us saying that they were willing to have regular ‘informal’ meetings with the CRA to exchange views but fell short of allowing the CRA to be part of the takeover process.

The fact that they have agreed to regular meetings is a step forward but we know many of our members, some of those living on Sector A, are not happy with allowing the ASHC to negotiate a takeover with the Council which will directly impact on the whole of Camposol when the remaining sectors are taken over.

Without doubt in their own opinion and in the eyes of the council ASHC are the only party able to represent A Sector in the negotiations. Although they try to distance themselves from the word ‘Entity’ they have evolved from the original Entity commmittee which is still legally in place. That said over the last few months many concerns have been raised about the ASHC. Some of these are as follows:

1. The ASHC only have one person voted in by the homeowners on sector A. The rest have been handpicked and given places on the committee. This is not democratic.

2. The statute of the Entity demands an AGM be held every 12 months. Not one in the last 3 years has been called. This is not only against their own rules but also not democratic. The committee apparently use the excuse that a referendum was held to keep what was the original committee in place until the immanent takeover by the council. That was nearly two years ago and there is still no sign of any takeover by the council?

3. The ASHC have talked of a watered down entity. What does that mean? What exactly will the homeowners be expected to pay for. Who will administer this system and who will be accountable to the homeowners.

4. It is known that the Entity are already in debt. Money is owed to the original administrator and lawyer. How much is owed? Who is going to pay it? Are the original administrator and lawyer still under contract to the Entity. If not who dismissed them. The rules of the entity say that this can only be done by the members vote in an AGM or EGM!!!

We on the CRA committee are happy to meet with the ASHC but if they remain unelected, undemocratic and questionably illegal then, on behalf of our members living on A Sector, we demand that they call an immediate AGM to answer all of the points above to all of the homeowners of A sector. We also request they reconsider their position of excluding the remainder of Camposol from their negotiations with the council about the takeover.

A proposal that the above should be taken forward was put forward by Stan Long and seconded by Peter Mendham, this action was agreed unanimously by the remainder of the members present.

Greg Green: Members proposals. I have two members’ proposals received by 22nd June which are therefore eligible for discussion at this meeting. Can I call on Mr Sears to stand up and introduce his proposal.

Mr Sears put a proposal forward that residents should refuse to pay IBI bills which he felt were due to be applied to properties on his sector in the near future.

Greg Green: The CRA cannot encourage any illegal action. You will have to pay eventually with fines which will be added to your house deeds if not paid. This is for individuals to make themselves”.

Greg then called on Mr R Sutton who lives on Camposol Sector A to put forward his proposal. As Mr Sutton was not present at the meeting Greg read his letter out to the meeting, the subject of which was to take action against Flights Fantastic who carry out stunt flying over the urbanisation.

Greg Green: stated that “The CRA believe this needs an individual approach initially as a denuncia to the police by Mr Sutton with a question as to the legality. Should the meeting decide to start a petition then we need Mr Sutton and others to help”
The unanimous decision from the floor about this proposed action was that this action should be dismissed.

Greg Green, then closed the meeting and said can I please remind you all that
“Apathy is not an option”.By being here today you have demonstrated that you care. Please go out and spread the word to your neighbours and friends. The meeting was then closed at 1pm.

Minutes to The EGM Held 16th Feb 2009

Monday, July 27th, 2009

Minutes to The EGM Held 16th Feb 2009

These minutes are virtually a 100% transcript of the meeting :

Extraordinary General Meeting – 16th Feb 2009

The Chairman – Introduction : Good morning Ladies & Gentlemen and welcome to the CRA EGM. Today’s meeting is going to very busy and at times, I think, quite confrontational. Can I ask you all to have respect for each other’s comments and to keep the meeting from becoming personal, please make your comments through the chair. Can I also ask that we respect the person who is speaking and not chat whilst they are talking.
We have a lot of ground to cover so please be patient I’m sure you will find all of it of great interest.
Let me introduce myself for those that do not know me. My name is Greg Green and I am acting Chairman to the CRA. The reason for me chairing this meeting will be made clear as we move forward.
Sitting with me at the table are Mary Cooper, Secretary and Joyce Stewart Treasurer.
I would like to point out that this EGM is solely for the purpose of reporting back on the response of Masa and the Mazarron Town Council to the Garrigues report to put forward our suggestions and to seek your support and agreement on further action.

CRA Liaison Committee: To start the meeting I would like to bring you up to date with the current situation within your committee.
Unfortunately two weeks ago Roy Pugh announced his immediate retirement from the position of chairman due to health reasons. Roy has been the chair for nearly 3 years and has worked very hard, many times under great pressure, to get us to the position we are today. The one great achievement of Roy’s reign is the completion of the Garrigues report which we will need greatly over the next few months. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Roy on your behalf for the work he has put in over the last 3 years and wish him and his wife Mary good health and a happy retirement.
Also some 4 weeks ago Brian Tokely our vice chairman was rushed in to hospital with heart problems. Brian has since returned home but is awaiting a call from the hospital for a triple bypass operation. I would also like to wish Brian a speedy recovery.
Further to this we have two members, Margaret and Bernard Whitley who have recently had to resign from the committee due to moving back to the UK to take up work opportunities. This was unavoidable and we also wish them well and look forward to seeing them again on their return to Camposol.
We also currently have two inactive committee members. They are Rathnait Mullen & Irache Merino. Both decided they were unable to continue due to internal personal situations and outside work commitments.
As you can see that leaves us with just 5 active members from a committee of 11.
Those still active are:
Myself, Acting Chairman
Joyce Stewart, Treasurer
Mary Cooper, Secretary
John Daws, Committee Member
Ken Richardson, Committee Member
Obviously the committee cannot continue under these circumstances. As you are maybe aware the CRA rules state that the committee has to be re-elected every 3 years. This was planned to happen in July of this year but because of these unusual circumstances the committee have decided to pull these elections forward to week starting 23rd March 2009. We have put the procedures for this election together and a copy is available by the door as you leave today’s meeting. These procedures will also be published on the website within the next few days. Those who wish to put themselves up for nomination can do so from today. We only ask for a photograph and a small résumé of up to 150 words to give their reasons why they should be selected.
I am sure you will hear this repeatedly from me this morning. The CRA cannot continue without members willing to stand up and be counted. The committee work does not take up that much time and although at times can seem thankless it becomes a very rewarding feeling knowing that you are putting something back in to our community. For those of you that are contemplating the move, then don’t just think about it, get off your backsides and do it. For those of you who like to talk the talk get off your backsides and walk the talk. As you will see as the meeting progresses, if we don’t do something as a community then we will be condoning a Camposol with a very bleak future.

Finances : I would like to give you a quick update on the current financial position of the CRA.
The CRA currently holds two bank accounts.
The Lawyers Fund is held at La Caixa and the balance is 4,272 Euros. After the January & February Bonus Ball of 380 Euros has been paid in the total will be 4,652 Euros.
The General Fund held at Cajamurcia stands at 537 Euros.
Further to these we hold 249 Euros in cash which will be go towards the cost of today’s meeting. We ask for further contributions please towards the meeting to be placed in the bucket by the door as you leave.
There were no questions put forward from the floor about the CRA Finances

The Chairman – Fund Raising: Currently we have 3 means of getting funds:
1. The Weekly Bonus ball which is based on the UK Lottery Saturday bonus ball and is kindly run by Bob & Val. This generates approximately 200 to 250 Euros per month, which goes in to the legal fund. I would also like to thank Bob & Val for their continued support and effort whilst they have themselves gone through the stress of having major defects to their own villa.
2. The weekly meat/grocery draw which pays out, depending on the number of tickets sold, two or three 30 Euro vouchers each week and makes on average 100 Euros a week which goes in to the general fund.
3. And finally donations which are paid in to which ever fund the donator asks for.
We hope to continue with both the bonus ball and weekly draw but need volunteers to sell tickets. If we get these volunteers we can increase the places that tickets are sold and hopefully increase the weekly take. If anyone would like to help please see a committee member at the end of this meeting. In reality it can mean just giving up an hour of your time each week.

Membership: As you will see later in the meeting funds will become a very important part of our decision making today. As of today we have just under 1900 members on our database. In reality the number of members is probably slightly less than this with members who have moved on either physically or spiritually and those no longer interested. There has been no charge made to be a member and the only information we hold is name, Camposol address, NIE or passport number and where possible a phone number. It was planned as an activity to take place later this year to update this database with more complete details such as resident, non resident, holiday home, rental, if not resident UK contact details, email address etc…
The reason we feel this would be a worthwhile exercise is because there is not to our knowledge a complete register in existence of who owns and who lives on Camposol. Therefore we would like to suggest that the existing CRA membership database is expanded to form a register for Camposol.
To boost the lawyers fund we also suggest that we make an administration charge of €10 for each amendment and addition to the register.
The Chairman: If you agree a register should be set up for Camposol and that an administration fee of 10 Euros should be charged for each amendment and addition would someone from the floor please make a proposal to this effect.
Proposed: Member Geoff Nastri proposed the above
Seconded: Member Marie Gilmartin seconded the above
Carried: By the majority
Opposed: One member objected to the above.

The Chairman – Sector A Committee: At the last EGM it was requested that we kept up pressure on the A Sector Committee to meet with the CRA and discuss a common ground for moving forward. Some two weeks ago another letter was sent to their chairman asking for a meeting. We have not received a reply but have heard informally that their chairman will not even agree to a meeting until a new CRA committee is voted in. We believe this is just another ploy to put off a meeting and will continue to fight for full representation of the CRA in discussions with any party re the taking over of sector A by the council. We fully support the prompt takeover of sector A by the council but it is essential that we are allowed not only to represent some 250 CRA members who live on sector A but also every other member who will be affected by whatever terms are agreed with the council for the takeover of sector A. In our recent meeting with the Mayor, Councillor Galvez assured us that she would speak with those concerned about the CRA inclusion in these meetings. Subsequently we have requested an update meeting with Councillor Galvez, in order to report progress to this meeting. We hope that this will take place in the next few days.

Current situation with Masa: I would like to update you with the current situation regarding Masa. Until Oct of last year we were having regular meetings with Daniel Bascu?ana the Chief Executive who also holds Power of Attorney on behalf of Masa. These meetings gave the opportunity to bring up the Masa related problems of our members such as repairs, missing licences, escrituras etc… We are pleased to say that a number of villas were repaired under this arrangement however, a number are still outstanding. After Oct 2008 meetings were still arranged but Senor Bascu?ana continually made last minute apologies for not attending. The Garrigues report with a solicitors’ letter was sent in late November to Masa and apart from a cancelled meeting planned for mid December nothing further has been heard from Senor Bascu?ana. A further email was sent by our lawyer in mid January asking for another meeting but we have received no reply. As far as we are aware there are now no Masa workers on Camposol apart from Lesley in the office and the infamous Miguel who turns up for a couple of hours each week and who, when asked any questions gives the stock answer of that it’s nothing to do with him. We have it on good authority that all Masa repairs have been suspended until further notice.

Meeting with the Mayor: I have gone through the situation with Masa to help to explain our reaction to the meeting with the Mayor which took place on the 21st Jan. The meeting was well attended with 5 members of the CRA committee, the Mayor, the councillor for development, the councillor for security and Jacqueline Galvez the councillor for foreigners. The full notes from the meeting were placed on the website and I’m sure most of you have seen them. The Mayor fully accepted the Garrigues report but continually placed the blame for all faults and delays with Masa. When challenged with the fact that as the council had allowed occupation of Camposol without the issuing of Certificates of Habitation and it was his legal and moral duty to protect the owners, he assured us that steps were being put in to place to move towards takeover of the urbanization. When pressed about time spans he would not commit himself but said regular meetings between his architects and councillors were taking place with Masa and everyone should be patient. He agreed to a guided tour of Camposol with the CRA and this has been arranged to take place on Monday 23rd February. It is obvious that if the council are having meetings with Masa then Masa’s continued absence from Camposol would indicate that they are ignoring any agreements made at these meetings.

Meeting with Lawyers: Over the last few weeks we have had several meetings with legal firms. Joaquin Ataz Ruiz has stepped down from his position with Garrigues and in his absence Garrigues have had difficulty in supplying a replacement who can liaise with the CLC other than to inform us that any future work undertaken by them would be at a cost of €250 per hour. This puts into context the value for money we got for the Garrigues report.
As a consequence of this we have looked for alternatives. We can report that we have had talks with Espadas Y Associates from Alhama de Murcia who specialise in Planning Issues and were involved in the much publicised case against the Mayor of Totana. We have asked them for guidance and recommendations on the way forward for Camposol based on the ‘Lawyers Report’.

We were advised by them that there are two legal options open to us:
1. To take legal action against Masa.
2. To take legal action against the Mazarron Town Council.
The problem with legal action against Masa is the expense that would be incurred and also the time the case would take to come to fruition. This is underlined by some current members who have taken legal action against Masa this has taken some two and a half years to get to the court stage and incurred upwards of 15,000 Euros in costs.
In the case of legal action against the council the process would be more rapid and the following procedures were discussed.
a. The lawyers would first of all request a meeting with the mayor and his legal advisors. At this meeting the council would be informed that unless they agreed to negotiations which would lead to a timely takeover over of Camposol then the CRA would instigate formal actions against them. In the opinion of the lawyers the council would agree to this and put immediate pressure on Masa to bring the urbanization up to a position where it could be taken over. At the same time the lawyer felt that this would almost certainly make the Town Hall take immediate action against Masa to secure the cost of completion. That could involve the calling in of guarantees and freezing of assets should Masa file for bankruptcy. If they didn’t do this and Masa went bankrupt it would create a massive political problem for the Town Hall to have to pay these costs from the public purse as it would mean all the taxpayers of Mazarron would have to pick up the bill.
b. If after 15 days the council were unwilling to negotiate or at any time not keep to agreed timetables then a ‘Formal Claim’ would be made against the council. The formal claim would have to taken in the names of individual members and not the CRA. The council would then have 3 months to submit written plans for the takeover.
c. If no answer was received from the council within 3 months then the lawyers on behalf of the CRA members would issue a full ‘Legal Claim’ with the courts and the matter would go before a judge. It is difficult to get an answer to how long this would take.
d. In conjunction with the first meeting with the mayor it was recommended that demonstrations take place outside of the Town Hall to impress on the Mayor and his councillors the strength of feeling of Camposol homeowners.
e. At the same time the lawyers would take out court action against Masa to cover costs and damages resulting in the action taken against the council.
It was the opinion of the lawyers that the Mayor would take early action to protect the council and taxpayers of Mazarron against massive costs and start negotiations.
By threatening to take or taking legal action against the council we believe we would also achieve our aim of applying pressure to Masa without any cost involved.
Before I come to the actual cost I would like to repeat a point I made earlier. The CRA as an organisation cannot take legal action against the council but it can provide the organisational clout to back up any such action. Any action would have to be taken collectively by individual members.
Bearing this in mind I can give you the following costs provided by Espadas Y Assoc.
The total cost will either be 61,000 Euros or 84,000 Euros depending on how the council responds to the first approach.
This is broken down as follows:
1. For preparing and attending a legal meeting with the Mayor and his legal advisors and if agreed full involvement in the negotiations needed for takeover of Camposol a fee of 11,000 Euros with a one off payment of 50,000 Euros when the whole of Camposol is taken over. This amounts to 61,000 Euros. An initial payment of 20% of the €11,000 (2,200 Euros) would be made up front with the remainder of the €11,000 being paid once negotiations are completed. The final €50,000 would be paid once takeover is completed by the council.
2. The alternative amount of 84,000 Euros would come in to play if the council refused to negotiate or did not carry out the actions agreed. The initial €11,000 with 20% deposit would still be paid and a further 23,000 Euros paid should actual court action be required. Again 20% (4,600 Euros) of the €23,000 would need to be paid at the start of the legal process with the remaining amount being paid on receipt of judgement from the court. The final payment of €50,000 would again be paid when the council completed the takeover of Camposol.
I hope I have explained that properly but just to ensure you understand it fully we will now pass around a handout giving full details.
At the bottom of the page you will find a tear off section which is for the use of those who wish to become fully involved in this process. It is not cheap. If we only get 100 owners to participate it will cost 610 or 840 Euros per owner. But if we had 1000 owners it would cost 61 or 84 Euros per owner and so on. If we get your approval today we will certainly push hard to maximise the number involved. By filling in the bottom section and handing it in to the committee you do not commit yourselves to pay anything. We will collate the numbers, work out the costs and then get back to everyone, possibly in another meeting, to ensure we still have full support. Whether money was paid up front or paid in instalments would be decided at this time. After this we will get the contract with the lawyers drawn up and all owners who commit themselves to the scheme will need to sign it before we start any action.
Questions & Answers: Various questions and opinions, all supporting legal action were put forward by the members.
The Chairman: Do you agree that Legal Action against Mazarron Town Council for the timely completion and adoption of Camposol should happen?

For the proposal: The majority of members voted in favour of the above proposal.
Against the proposal: Four members rejected the above proposal.

Member Geoff Nastri put forward an alternative proposal that the €84,000 could be raised through donations additional to the €10 agreed earlier on in the meeting when members are re-registering their membership.
The Chairman: then put the two payment options as discussed above to the floor for approval:

Option one: To commit to the payment scheme described by the chairman and documented in the handout distributed in the meeting.

Option Two: To commit to the alternative payment scheme as put forward from member Geoff Nastri.

Votes for option one: Three members voted in favour of option one
Votes for option two: The majority of members voted in favour of option two.
The Chairman: I would like to point out that there is a good chance that costs and damages will be recovered from Masa and everyone could then get their money back.
Re-registration: will take place Monday to Friday between 4 and 5pm at the post room in Rumours. We urge all members to re-register and make their donations to the lawyers fund as soon as possible.
The committee will also look into holding additional dedicated sessions to carry out this work, Dates times etc. will be communicated as soon as this can be arranged.

The Chairman – Demonstrations : The second recommendation we have is that we start a series of demonstrations in Mazarron to show the Mayor and the council the strength of unrest within Camposol and to back up our threat of legal action.
We recommend that these commence with a demonstration outside of the Town Hall to coincide with the monthly council plenum (meeting) when the Mayor and all councillors will be present. We already have details of how to register this demonstration which would be a gathering with speakers.
The Chairman: Do you agree that we should start a series of demonstrations?
For the proposal: The majority of the members voted for the above proposal
Against the proposal: Three members rejected the above proposal
The Chairman: We as a committee cannot arrange this type of gathering with the numbers we have. I would like to start a sub group of 3 or 4 people to work with the committee to get this organised. We need these people to let us know who they are now. Without such support we cannot move this forward.

Recommendations : We have two further requests :
Unfortunately due to the problems discussed earlier within the committee we have not been able to start lobbying activities. We need a small group of people 2/3 to form a sub group to write and contact any parties who may be of use in resolving our problems. We have a large number of names and organisations to contact and now we need volunteers to assist. If you can give up a small amount of time to help with this process please come to the desk at the end of this meeting.
We have been giving regular information on the website and local press of organisations who individuals can contact. Hopefully this has been acted on.
We have been very poor in getting press coverage of our situation. This is not through lack of trying but that we have no expertise in this specialised field. If there is anyone with press officer or Public Relations experience please come forward we need your help.

The Chairman – What do we need ? To support our plans we need :
A strong, enthusiastic new committee. (11/15 people)
A sub committee for organising demonstrations. (3/4 people)
A sub committee for preparation of lobbying documents. (2/3people)
An experienced press officer or PR officer.
Volunteers to sell draw tickets.
Now is not the time to sit and feel sorry for ourselves and moan. Now is the time to stand up and be counted!!

The following members put their names forward to help organise demonstrations:
David Sutherland
Tony Connolly
Mick Drummond
Tom Carpenter
Derek Smith
(Derek also has computer/printing/internet available if required)

The following members put their names forward to help sell tickets:
Roisin
Rosaline

The following members put their names forward to help compose letters to various authorities/organisations:
Sue James
(Sue will also help update the members register if required)
Theresa Edge
Brenda Collis
Vivien Rosling
Lloyd Jones
Barrie Eveleigh
Morag Truelove
Mr & Mrs Abbey
( Mr & Mrs Abbey offered to help with anything over the next two weeks if required)

Many thanks to all of the above volunteers. The committee will be in touch with these volunteers very shortly to organise a meeting with the various groups to appraise them of what is required.

We are still in desperate need of a Press Officer and it would be good if we had a few more people to help sell tickets etc.
If there is anyone else who can offer their services to any of the above groups then please don’t hesitate to put your names forward to any member of the committee.

The Chairman – Owners with Problems : Earlier in the meeting I mentioned that we had agreed to act as a middle man in the negotiations between some of our members with build problems and Masa. There have been a number of success stories but we have recently heard that Masa have suspended any further work undertaken by Marios builders on their behalf. It is with regret that without any willingness of Masa to meet the CRA we cannot at this time move these cases forward. Our only suggestion is that individuals take legal advice about their own particular circumstances. We will continue with our efforts to find solutions through other means. We have had meetings with another law firm with expertise in this field. They are Fernando Campillo Abagados from Murcia and we are currently awaiting a proposal from them with details of possible costs should a number of members with problems wish to take legal action against Masa. We will release these details on the website once we have them.

Thank you for your attention. It has been a long meeting and we will be publishing full minutes on the website and in the post room as soon as possible.

There is a collection box by the door where you can make donations to help pay for today’s meeting the remainder will go to the legal fund.

Many thanks to those of you who put a donation in the box to help with the cost of today’s meeting. This collection amounted to €511.